A new study by the Advantage Compendium Scary Math Institute concludes an age 65 couple will need $93,369 in savings to have a 50 percent chance of covering coffee expenses during retirement and could need as much as $245,880 to have a 90 percent chance, as this frightening looking table clearly shows:
The following table shows: Savings Needed to buy two Starbucks Cafe Mochas per day (without donut-hole)
Individuals should be concerned about saving for out-of-pocket coffee expenses in retirement for a number of reasons. Medicare generally covers only about two-thirds of the cost of coffee health care (e.g. coffee enemas and drips) and zero coverage for recreational coffee usage. Issues surrounding retirement coffee security are certain to become an even greater challenge in the future.
Wasn’t that silly...
There are a number of issues with this fictional study that mimics the language of actual studies. One is that not everyone drinks coffee, so for them there is no expense. Second, one isn’t forced to buy their venti Café Mocha at Starbucks at $4.76 (including tax), which is the item used to calculate costs. They could buy generic coffee—or coffee from Canada—at a much lower price. Third, people don’t prepay for a lifetime of coffee, they buy it one cup or pound at a time. Even using the high side, the first year cost for those daily Starbucks coffees is a more manageable $3,400 and any price increases will hopefully match the cost of living raises in those Social Security checks. The reality is no one needs to set aside $245,880 by age 65 to buy coffee and presenting it this way is extremely misleading…but that doesn’t stop researchers from doing it as a form of fear mongering.
You’ve seen newspaper headlines such as “Medicare Beneficiaries Could Need $400,000 for Uncovered Health Expenses” and then citing some study. And the studies also include other scary remarks such as “Starting in 2020, new Medicare beneficiaries will no longer be allowed to purchase Plan F that covers the Part B deductible.” However, since this is designed to scare and not educate, what they don’t say is that the Part B deductible is only $135.50 per year for most, and that almost everyone will pay less than $500 a month to buy supplemental insurance to cover the uncovered health expenses (and even the drug donut-hole cost gap is scheduled to be mostly closed in 2020). Of course, the reason they don’t say it is no one will be afraid of having to pay an additional $135.50 per year—and $500 a month sounds a lot less scary than coming up with $400,000 in a lump sum.
Although part of the motivation for the researchers is that the scarier sounding the problem, the easier it is to get grant money for new research, I believe the fear mongering is largely well-intended. In this case fear is used to get political attention on both the largely unregulated world of medical and drug price-gouging, and gaps in coverage that can force a retiree to choose between eating and buying their pills. The reality is much can be done to lower medical costs and there are still gaps that can devastate the lives of millions of low income retirees unless fixed. But it would be nice if research studies simply presented their conclusions and left the hyperbole to the politicians.
provides research and consulting services to insurance companies and financial firms in a variety of annuity areas. He also serves as director of research for the National Association for Fixed Annuities and as a research fellow for Webster University. In 1994 he wrote a book to help banks market investment and insurance solutions to their small business clients. In 1996 he produced the first independent hypothetical return monthly publication comparing all index annuities on the market, and in 1997 created the first comprehensive report of index annuity sales, products and trends, "Advantage Index Product Sales & Market Report" (quarterly). His insights on the annuity and retirement income world have appeared in hundreds of publications. In 2006 the National Association of Insurance Commissioners asked him to address their annual meeting and teach regulators the realities of index annuities. He was invited back in 2009 to talk to the NAIC about the effects of aging on senior decision-making. He is a frequent speaker at industry functions. Prior to forming Advantage Compendium, Marrion was president and owner of an NASD broker/dealer with offices in nine states. Previous to that he was vice president of a life insurance company and vice president of an NYSE investment banking firm. He has a BBA from the University of Iowa, an MBA from the University of Missouri, and a doctorate from Webster University. Marrion can be reached at Advantage Compendium, Telephone: 314-255-6531. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org.